MontrealExperts are raising concerns over Quebec’s plan to merge two major health agencies as part of a broader plan to reduce bureaucracy. They warn the move could weaken public health, reduce preventive care, fragment services and prioritize short-term treatment over long-term population health.Government says merger will increase efficiency, but professors warn it could reduce preventive careIsaac Olson · CBC News · Posted: Dec 02, 2025 4:00 AM EST | Last Updated: 5 hours agoListen to this articleEstimated 4 minutesThe audio version of this article is generated by text-to-speech, a technology based on artificial intelligence.Treasury Board President France-Élaine Duranceau tabled a bill on Nov. 5 that would fuse the Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ) and the Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS). (Jacques Boissinot/The Canadian Press)Some experts are sounding the alarm over the Quebec government’s proposal to merge two flagship health agencies as part of a broader plan to reduce bureaucracy and increase state efficiency.Bill 7, tabled last month by Treasury Board President France-Élaine Duranceau, is designed to save $35 million, primarily by cutting 220 full-time positions, including about 100 in the health-care system. The bill would fuse the Institut national de santé publique du Québec (INSPQ) and the Institut national d’excellence en santé et en services sociaux (INESSS) into a single new institute.It would transfer the activities of the three INSPQ medical biology laboratories to Santé Québec, while assigning the functions of organ and tissue donation co-ordination currently exercised by Transplant Québec to Héma-Québec.However, not everyone agrees with the plan. Olivier Jacques, a professor specializing in health policy at Université de Montréal, recently raised concerns with the government, saying he sees no clear line between potential savings and the cost to services as each agency serves its own important function.“We have difficulty to see what is the intent of policymakers there,” Jacques told CBC News.“There’s not much money to save, and there’s not much efficiency gains to have and, in contrast, it could be a real issue for public health in the province in general.”Citing the old saying, he said, “if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it.”Problems exposed during pandemicIn a statement issued this week, Duranceau’s office insists the merger will fix problems exposed during the COVID-19 pandemic.“The pandemic revealed the limits of a fragmented model in which the lack of co-ordination between the two institutes hindered the speed of the response on the ground,” the statement says.The statement says that by combining these areas of expertise, the government can work more efficiently, make responsibilities clearer and better meet the health system’s current and future needs.Inside a Montreal clinic struggling to deal with Quebec’s imposed health reforms“The government’s intention remains to fully preserve the missions of both organizations, which are highly complementary,” it says.It added that the government has “heard the concerns” raised by INSPQ senior officials during parliamentary consultations and that teams across affected ministries are reviewing submitted briefs “to assess whether follow-up is warranted to improve the bill.”Preventive care always loses, expert saysJacques said he’s not convinced fusing these agencies will create more efficiency. Neither is his colleague, Nathalie Clavel, assistant professor specializing in health services management at Université de Montréal.They both spoke to a parliamentary committee about the bill last week, expressing several concerns with the bill — including the fragmentation of key services and the reduction of preventive care. Olivier Jacques, a professor specializing in health policy at Université de Montréal, says he doesn’t agree with fusing key public health agencies. (Caroline Perron/Submitted)In a later interview with CBC News, Jacques expressed concerns about the possible loss of expertise and prevention with, for example, the research and INSPQ labs going to Santé Québec.Public health is about improving the population’s health in the future, whereas health-care problems are acute in the present, he explained. “I am really concerned that the budgets would be much more allocated toward the curative functions related to INESSS to the detriment of the preventive, long-term oriented functions of the INSPQ,” he said.Quebec’s new secularism bill targets daycare workers, prayer spaces and religious mealsBecause one agency is controlling the budget, short-term curative care may ultimately get the bulk of funding, he said, adding his research shows when the two budgets are in competition, preventive care always loses. Despite the effectiveness of prevention, he said even the public prefers to see funding go toward the immediate curative-care crisis rather than prevention. While he sees the merger as a mistake, he explained, separate budgets should at least be maintained for the two functions if the government goes through with it. He also says there is no proof that other governments have successfully done the same merger.”I don’t think the fusion is a good idea,” he said. “It’s two institutions that have two very different perspectives and two very different missions.”ABOUT THE AUTHORIsaac Olson is a journalist with CBC Montreal. He worked largely as a newspaper reporter and photographer for 15 years before joining CBC in the spring of 2018.
Experts warn merger of 2 Quebec health agencies could undermine public health
